October 21, 2009

Open Ed Tech 2009: A Call to Action

An official communiqué has now been issued by the Open Educational Technology 2009 summit. The Call to Action provides the context for the summit and the final action items. Interestingly, the eight action items agreed to by the participants have been reduced to five.

1. We must encourage the reuse and remixing of rich media. In order to achieve this, it

must be easier to find, use, and cite pieces of media, especially for educational

purposes. Contextual tools that perform these tasks, co-developed by students as the

end-users, must be created and made available to all. We must also develop ways to

translate rich media, not only between languages, but also between modalities, such

that content produced in a certain geographical area and medium may be accessed

and reused in other places and in other forms. Portability of rich media is key; content

must not be tied to a certain platform for delivery, nor to a specific medium or

environment.

2. We must embrace the full promise of mobile devices as learning platforms. Mobiles

— not simply phones, but all kinds of handheld and portable devices — are a

powerful tool for learning because they are controlled by the holder. With mobile

devices, users can direct their own learning experiences, accessing information where

and when they need it. It is critical that we effect a paradigm shift toward recognizing

mobiles as a primary platform for delivery of educational content — not content that

is translated for use on mobiles, but content that is designed for such use from the

outset. We must actively encourage development practices that remove platform

independency. Likewise, we must advocate for a global mobile network that is as easy

to use, as inexpensive, and even more ubiquitous than the web.

3. We must award credentials based on learning outcomes. It is time to recognize the

learning that occurs outside of courses and beyond classroom walls. The model of

awarding credentials solely on the basis of participation in established programs must

give way to a more flexible design that separates credentials from coursework and

recognizes mastery regardless of where or how it is attained. As more learners choose

alternate means of education, including non-university programs, mentoring,

apprenticeship, and other informal or innovative options, we must accept and

recognize their achievements as equivalent to those gained in more traditional ways.


4. We must enable a culture of sharing. Recognizing that the sharing and reuse of

scholarly work is a key component of the university of the future, we advocate

building a culture of sharing in which concerns about intellectual property, copyright,

and student-to-student collaboration are alleviated and the model of proprietary work

dissolves in favor of a more open one. To this end, we must establish reward structures

that support the sharing of work in progress, ongoing research, highly collaborative

projects, and scholarly publications of all kinds, including reputation systems, peer

review processes, and new models for citation of such content. We must empower

students to share knowledge with one another in ways that are viewed as

collaboration rather than cheating. Assessment models must change to support these

practices. Ultimately, we see a culture of sharing as a crucial piece of the infrastructure

of a scalable educational system that can support the millions of learners who will

participate in it.

5. We must take care that open resources include the context that will enable its use and

understanding. Content out of context is at best easy to misconstrue, and at worst,

too difficult to use. Producers of open content must consider ways of attaching

pedagogical narratives to content that will help provide necessary context. One

approach is the notion of “pedagogical wrappers” — specific guidelines and processes

that can ensure the content is placed in an appropriate context — or in the case of

broadly useful topics, a variety of appropriate contexts. Such wrappers would ensure

that the focus remains on learning objectives and process, rather than on the

technology used to deliver the learning materials.


Read the full communiqué.

0 comments: